FOR RELEASE: March 31, 2005
Media contact: Nicola Pytell
Office: 607-255-6074
E-Mail: nwp2@cornell.edu
Don't let grass grow under your feet -- burn it as economical,
environmentally friendly biofuel, Cornell expert urges
ITHACA, N.Y. -- Grow grass, not for fun but for fuel. Burning grass for
energy has been a well-accepted technology in Europe for decades. But not in
the United States.
Yet burning grass pellets as a biofuel is economical, energy-efficient,
environmentally friendly and sustainable, says a Cornell University forage
crop expert.
This alternative fuel easily could be produced and pelleted by farmers
and burned in modified stoves built to burn wood pellets or corn, says Jerry
Cherney, the E.V. Baker Professor of Agriculture. Burning grass pellets
hasn't caught on in the United States, however, Cherney says, primarily
because Washington has made no effort to support the technology with
subsidies or research dollars.
"Burning grass pellets makes sense; after all, it takes 70 days to grow a
crop of grass for pellets, but it takes 70 million years to make fossil
fuels," says Cherney, who notes that a grass-for-fuel crop could help
supplement farmers' incomes. Cherney presented the case for grass biofuel at
a U.S. Department of Agriculture-sponsored conference, Greenhouse Gases and
Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture and Forestry, held March 21-24 in
Baltimore.
"Grass pellets have great potential as a low-tech, small-scale, renewable
energy system that can be locally produced, locally processed and locally
consumed, while having a positive impact on rural communities," Cherney told
the conference.
The downside? "Unfortunately grass has no political lobby, which makes
the start up of any new alternative energy industry problematic," says
Cherney. He notes that a pellet-fuel industry was successfully established
in Europe by providing subsidies to the industry. And even though the ratio
of the amount of energy needed to produce grass pellets to the amount of
energy they produce is much more favorable than for other biomass crops, the
lack of government support prevents the industry from going forward, he
says.
Cherney has made a comparison of wood pellets with various mixes of
grasses and the BTUs (British Thermal Units) produced per pound. He has
found that grass pellets can be burned without emissions problems, and they
have 96 percent of the BTUs of wood pellets. He also notes that grass
produces more ash than wood -- meaning more frequent cleaning -- of stoves.
Currently, he is testing the burning of pellets made from grasses, such as
timothy and orchard grass, as well as weeds, such as goldenrod, in pellet
stoves at Cornell's Mt. Pleasant Research Farm. This demonstration project
is funded by Cornell's Agricultural Experiment Station.
Cherney points out that grass biofuel pellets are much better for the
environment because they emit up to 90 percent less greenhouse gases than
oil, coal and natural gas do. Furthermore, he says, grass is perennial, does
not require fertilization and can be grown on marginal farmland.
"Any mixture of grasses can be used, cut in mid- to late summer, left in
the field to leach out minerals, then baled and pelleted. Drying of the hay
is not required for pelleting, making the cost of processing less than with
wood pelleting," says Cherney. "The bottom line is that pelletized grass has
the potential to be a major affordable, unsubsidized fuel source capable of
meeting home and small business heating requirements at less cost than all
available alternatives."
Related World Wide Web sites: The following sites provide
additional information on this news release. Some might not be part of the
Cornell University community, and Cornell has no control over their content
or availability.
Jerry Cherney:
http://www.css.cornell.edu/faculty/cherney.html
-30-
great news proof:
http://www.treepower.org/news/iowa.html
great news proof:
http://www.hindu.com/seta/2005/04/07/stories/2005040700121700.htm
|